Spot on. This is the direction the industry is moving.
Interesting. Our team went with Y instead due to Z constraints.
After 3 months of testing, here are our findings: ✓ Pros: faster deployments, better visibility ✗ Cons: initial setup complexity, team training Overal...
We tried this but hit issues with X. How did you solve it? Our team is particularly concerned about production stability.
What about monitoring? How do you track metrics? Trying to build a business case for management.
What about monitoring? How do you track metrics? Our team is particularly concerned about production stability.
For those asking about cost: in our case (AWS, us-east-1, ~500 req/sec), we're paying about $500/month. That's 30% vs our old setup with ArgoCD. ROI w...
After 3 months of testing, here are our findings: ✓ Pros: faster deployments, better visibility ✗ Cons: initial setup complexity, team training Overal...
Cautionary tale: we rushed this implementation without proper testing and it caused a 4-hour outage. The issue was DNS resolution delay. Lesson learne...
What about monitoring? How do you track metrics? Trying to build a business case for management.
Pro tip: if you're implementing this, make sure to configure resource quotas correctly. We spent 2 weeks debugging random failures only to discover th...
Integration with existing tools was tricky for us.
This is a game changer for teams doing GitOps! We integrated it with our existing ArgoCD + Ansible and the results were immediate. Developer productiv...
In our production environment with 200+ microservices, we found that Ansible significantly outperformed Docker. The key was proper configuration of me...
This is a game changer for teams doing Infrastructure as Code! We integrated it with our existing Terraform + Kubernetes and the results were immediat...