Interesting. Our team went with Y instead due to Z constraints.
What about security? Did you run into any compliance issues? Looking for real-world benchmarks if anyone has them.
Be careful with this approach. We had production issues.
Did you use version X or Y? We found Y more stable. Our team is particularly concerned about production stability.
Has anyone else encountered issues with GitLab CI when running in GCP eu-west-1? We're seeing intermittent failures during peak traffic. Our setup: hy...
Integration with existing tools was tricky for us.
We implemented this using the following approach: 1. First step... 2. Then we... 3. Finally... Results: significant improvement in deployment speed. S...
Has anyone else encountered issues with Kubernetes when running in GCP eu-west-1? We're seeing intermittent failures during peak traffic. Our setup: c...
For those asking about cost: in our case (AWS, us-east-1, ~500 req/sec), we're paying about $2000/month. That's 30% vs our old setup with Prometheus. ...
For those asking about cost: in our case (AWS, us-east-1, ~500 req/sec), we're paying about $5000/month. That's 70% vs our old setup with Docker. ROI ...
We evaluated this last year. The main challenge was...
In our production environment with 200+ microservices, we found that ArgoCD significantly outperformed Terraform. The key was proper configuration of ...
We evaluated ArgoCD last quarter and decided against it due to learning curve. Instead, we went with Grafana which better fit our use case. The main f...
For those asking about cost: in our case (AWS, us-east-1, ~500 req/sec), we're paying about $500/month. That's 60% vs our old setup with ArgoCD. ROI w...