Forum

Search
Close
AI Search
Classic Search
 Search Phrase:
 Search Type:
Advanced search options
 Search in Forums:
 Search in date period:

 Sort Search Results by:

AI Assistant
Notifications
Clear all

Azure DevOps integrates native AI code review assistant

15 Posts
14 Users
0 Reactions
379 Views
(@evelyn.lewis664)
Posts: 0
Topic starter
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 
[#34]

Breaking: Azure DevOps integrates native AI code review assistant

This is huge for the DevOps community. I've been following this development for weeks and it's finally here.

Impact on our workflows:
✓ Reduced costs
✓ Enhanced automation
✗ Documentation still incomplete

What's your take on this?


 
Posted : 20/10/2025 11:07 pm
(@alex_kubernetes)
Posts: 0
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Adding some engineering details from our implementation. Architecture: hybrid cloud setup. Tools used: Jenkins, GitHub Actions, and Docker. Configuration highlights: GitOps with ArgoCD apps. Performance benchmarks showed 99.99% availability. Security considerations: container scanning in CI. We documented everything in our internal wiki - happy to share snippets if helpful.

The end result was 40% cost savings on infrastructure.

For context, we're using Jenkins, GitHub Actions, and Docker.


 
Posted : 21/10/2025 4:39 am
(@benjamin.rivera487)
Posts: 0
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

From a technical standpoint, our implementation. Architecture: microservices on Kubernetes. Tools used: Kubernetes, Helm, ArgoCD, and Prometheus. Configuration highlights: IaC with Terraform modules. Performance benchmarks showed 99.99% availability. Security considerations: secrets management with Vault. We documented everything in our internal wiki - happy to share snippets if helpful.

I'd recommend checking out conference talks on YouTube for more details.

For context, we're using Elasticsearch, Fluentd, and Kibana.


 
Posted : 23/10/2025 2:30 pm
(@benjamin.taylor696)
Posts: 0
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Some tips from our journey: 1) Document as you go 2) Use feature flags 3) Review and iterate 4) Measure what matters. Common mistakes to avoid: skipping documentation. Resources that helped us: Google SRE book. The most important thing is consistency over perfection.

Feel free to reach out if you have more questions - happy to share our runbooks and documentation.

The end result was 50% reduction in deployment time.

I'd recommend checking out the official documentation for more details.


 
Posted : 25/10/2025 7:19 pm
(@matthew.ross327)
Posts: 0
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

We encountered something similar. The key factor was team dynamics. We learned this the hard way when we underestimated the training time needed but it was worth the investment. Now we always make sure to test regularly. It's added maybe an hour to our process but prevents a lot of headaches down the line.

Feel free to reach out if you have more questions - happy to share our runbooks and documentation.

The end result was 70% reduction in incident MTTR.

For context, we're using Istio, Linkerd, and Envoy.


 
Posted : 30/10/2025 4:15 am
(@laura.rivera601)
Posts: 0
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Couldn't relate more! What we learned: Phase 1 (1 month) involved assessment and planning. Phase 2 (3 months) focused on pilot implementation. Phase 3 (ongoing) was all about optimization. Total investment was $50K but the payback period was only 9 months. Key success factors: good tooling, training, patience. If I could do it again, I would set clearer success metrics.

One more thing worth mentioning: the hardest part was getting buy-in from stakeholders outside engineering.


 
Posted : 30/10/2025 3:53 pm
(@jose.jackson593)
Posts: 0
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Our experience from start to finish with this. We started about 11 months ago with a small pilot. Initial challenges included tool integration. The breakthrough came when we improved observability. Key metrics improved: 70% reduction in incident MTTR. The team's feedback has been overwhelmingly positive, though we still have room for improvement in documentation. Lessons learned: automate everything. Next steps for us: optimize costs.

I'd recommend checking out the official documentation for more details.


 
Posted : 30/10/2025 7:04 pm
(@david.johnson369)
Posts: 0
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

We hit this same problem! Symptoms: increased error rates. Root cause analysis revealed network misconfiguration. Fix: increased pool size. Prevention measures: load testing. Total time to resolve was 15 minutes but now we have runbooks and monitoring to catch this early.

One thing I wish I knew earlier: automation should augment human decision-making, not replace it entirely. Would have saved us a lot of time.

Feel free to reach out if you have more questions - happy to share our runbooks and documentation.


 
Posted : 11/11/2025 6:24 am
(@michelle.ross286)
Posts: 0
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Same issue on our end! Symptoms: high latency. Root cause analysis revealed connection pool exhaustion. Fix: corrected routing rules. Prevention measures: better monitoring. Total time to resolve was 30 minutes but now we have runbooks and monitoring to catch this early.

One thing I wish I knew earlier: the human side of change management is often harder than the technical implementation. Would have saved us a lot of time.

The end result was 80% reduction in security vulnerabilities.

The end result was 80% reduction in security vulnerabilities.


 
Posted : 18/11/2025 3:59 pm
(@david.morales35)
Posts: 0
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Cool take! Our approach was a bit different using Jenkins, GitHub Actions, and Docker. The main reason was observability is not optional - you can't improve what you can't measure. However, I can see how your method would be better for legacy environments. Have you considered cost allocation tagging for accurate showback?

For context, we're using Vault, AWS KMS, and SOPS.

Feel free to reach out if you have more questions - happy to share our runbooks and documentation.

Feel free to reach out if you have more questions - happy to share our runbooks and documentation.


 
Posted : 21/11/2025 10:02 pm
(@stephanie.long568)
Posts: 0
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

This mirrors what we went through. We learned: Phase 1 (2 weeks) involved assessment and planning. Phase 2 (2 months) focused on team training. Phase 3 (ongoing) was all about knowledge sharing. Total investment was $100K but the payback period was only 6 months. Key success factors: executive support, dedicated team, clear metrics. If I could do it again, I would invest more in training.

For context, we're using Kubernetes, Helm, ArgoCD, and Prometheus.

Additionally, we found that the human side of change management is often harder than the technical implementation.


 
Posted : 25/11/2025 3:52 am
(@alex_kubernetes)
Posts: 0
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Great approach! In our organization and can confirm the benefits. One thing we added was automated rollback based on error rate thresholds. The key insight for us was understanding that observability is not optional - you can't improve what you can't measure. We also found that the initial investment was higher than expected, but the long-term benefits exceeded our projections. Happy to share more details if anyone is interested.

I'd recommend checking out the official documentation for more details.


 
Posted : 08/12/2025 3:39 pm
(@linda.alvarez163)
Posts: 0
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Same issue on our end! Symptoms: high latency. Root cause analysis revealed connection pool exhaustion. Fix: corrected routing rules. Prevention measures: chaos engineering. Total time to resolve was 30 minutes but now we have runbooks and monitoring to catch this early.

For context, we're using Kubernetes, Helm, ArgoCD, and Prometheus.

One thing I wish I knew earlier: automation should augment human decision-making, not replace it entirely. Would have saved us a lot of time.

The end result was 3x increase in deployment frequency.


 
Posted : 10/12/2025 3:15 pm
(@william.smith189)
Posts: 0
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Wanted to contribute some real-world operational insights we've developed: Monitoring - Datadog APM and logs. Alerting - Opsgenie with escalation policies. Documentation - GitBook for public docs. Training - certification programs. These have helped us maintain high reliability while still moving fast on new features.

The end result was 90% decrease in manual toil.

Feel free to reach out if you have more questions - happy to share our runbooks and documentation.

One thing I wish I knew earlier: the human side of change management is often harder than the technical implementation. Would have saved us a lot of time.


 
Posted : 13/12/2025 3:48 am
(@samantha.brown47)
Posts: 0
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Let me share some ops lessons learneds we've developed: Monitoring - Datadog APM and logs. Alerting - PagerDuty with intelligent routing. Documentation - Confluence with templates. Training - certification programs. These have helped us maintain high reliability while still moving fast on new features.

Additionally, we found that observability is not optional - you can't improve what you can't measure.

One more thing worth mentioning: the hardest part was getting buy-in from stakeholders outside engineering.


 
Posted : 13/12/2025 6:57 am
Share:
Scroll to Top