Forum

Search
Close
AI Search
Classic Search
 Search Phrase:
 Search Type:
Advanced search options
 Search in Forums:
 Search in date period:

 Sort Search Results by:

AI Assistant
Deep dive: Setting ...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Deep dive: Setting up a multi-region disaster recovery strategy on AWS

22 Posts
18 Users
0 Reactions
37 Views
(@jeffrey.alvarez11)
Posts: 0
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

We encountered this as well! Symptoms: high latency. Root cause analysis revealed network misconfiguration. Fix: increased pool size. Prevention measures: chaos engineering. Total time to resolve was 30 minutes but now we have runbooks and monitoring to catch this early.

For context, we're using Grafana, Loki, and Tempo.

For context, we're using Datadog, PagerDuty, and Slack.

For context, we're using Datadog, PagerDuty, and Slack.

Additionally, we found that security must be built in from the start, not bolted on later.

The end result was 70% reduction in incident MTTR.

The end result was 3x increase in deployment frequency.

The end result was 40% cost savings on infrastructure.

One more thing worth mentioning: we underestimated the training time needed but it was worth the investment.

One more thing worth mentioning: we discovered several hidden dependencies during the migration.

Feel free to reach out if you have more questions - happy to share our runbooks and documentation.


 
Posted : 09/05/2025 10:43 pm
(@donald.stewart436)
Posts: 0
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

From beginning to end, here's what we did with this. We started about 3 months ago with a small pilot. Initial challenges included team training. The breakthrough came when we automated the testing. Key metrics improved: 3x increase in deployment frequency. The team's feedback has been overwhelmingly positive, though we still have room for improvement in automation. Lessons learned: communicate often. Next steps for us: expand to more teams.

One more thing worth mentioning: unexpected benefits included better developer experience and faster onboarding.


 
Posted : 10/05/2025 5:42 pm
(@kathleen.watson88)
Posts: 0
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

We saw this same issue! Symptoms: high latency. Root cause analysis revealed memory leaks. Fix: fixed the leak. Prevention measures: chaos engineering. Total time to resolve was a few hours but now we have runbooks and monitoring to catch this early.

The end result was 80% reduction in security vulnerabilities.

Feel free to reach out if you have more questions - happy to share our runbooks and documentation.

One thing I wish I knew earlier: the human side of change management is often harder than the technical implementation. Would have saved us a lot of time.

Feel free to reach out if you have more questions - happy to share our runbooks and documentation.

The end result was 99.9% availability, up from 99.5%.

For context, we're using Istio, Linkerd, and Envoy.

One more thing worth mentioning: integration with existing tools was smoother than anticipated.

I'd recommend checking out the official documentation for more details.

One thing I wish I knew earlier: failure modes should be designed for, not discovered in production. Would have saved us a lot of time.


 
Posted : 10/05/2025 7:25 pm
(@maria.carter392)
Posts: 0
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Technically speaking, a few key factors come into play. First, data residency. Second, monitoring coverage. Third, performance tuning. We spent significant time on testing and it was worth it. Code samples available on our GitHub if anyone wants to take a look. Performance testing showed 10x throughput increase.

The end result was 60% improvement in developer productivity.

One more thing worth mentioning: integration with existing tools was smoother than anticipated.

For context, we're using Istio, Linkerd, and Envoy.


 
Posted : 11/05/2025 7:53 am
(@jerry.green681)
Posts: 0
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Great post! We've been doing this for about 10 months now and the results have been impressive. Our main learning was that security must be built in from the start, not bolted on later. We also discovered that we discovered several hidden dependencies during the migration. For anyone starting out, I'd recommend integration with our incident management system.

Additionally, we found that observability is not optional - you can't improve what you can't measure.

I'd recommend checking out the official documentation for more details.


 
Posted : 12/05/2025 8:16 am
(@jerry.green681)
Posts: 0
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Great post! We've been doing this for about 8 months now and the results have been impressive. Our main learning was that failure modes should be designed for, not discovered in production. We also discovered that we had to iterate several times before finding the right balance. For anyone starting out, I'd recommend real-time dashboards for stakeholder visibility.

Feel free to reach out if you have more questions - happy to share our runbooks and documentation.

I'd recommend checking out relevant blog posts for more details.


 
Posted : 13/05/2025 2:49 am
(@donald.lee803)
Posts: 0
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Let me dive into the technical side of our implementation. Architecture: hybrid cloud setup. Tools used: Elasticsearch, Fluentd, and Kibana. Configuration highlights: IaC with Terraform modules. Performance benchmarks showed 3x throughput improvement. Security considerations: zero-trust networking. We documented everything in our internal wiki - happy to share snippets if helpful.

The end result was 3x increase in deployment frequency.

Additionally, we found that observability is not optional - you can't improve what you can't measure.


 
Posted : 14/05/2025 4:23 pm
Page 2 / 2
Share:
Scroll to Top