Implementing predictive scaling with AWS SageMaker AutoML
Implementing predictive scaling with AWS SageMaker AutoML - has anyone else tried this approach?
We're evaluating AI-powered solutions for pipeline optimization and this looks promising.
Concerns:
- Data privacy: are we comfortable sending metrics to external AI?
- Accuracy: can we trust AI for security-critical tasks?
- Cost: is the ROI there for regulated industries?
Looking for real-world experiences, not marketing hype. Thanks!
How did you handle the migration? Any gotchas to watch for? Trying to build a business case for management.
For those asking about cost: in our case (AWS, us-east-1, ~500 req/sec), we're paying about $1000/month. That's 50% vs our old setup with Terraform. ROI was positive after just 2 months when you factor in engineering time saved.
In our production environment with 200+ microservices, we found that Terraform significantly outperformed Ansible. The key was proper configuration of scaling parameters. Deployment time dropped from 45min to 8min. Highly recommended for teams running Kubernetes at scale.
What's the performance impact? Did you benchmark before/after? Our team is particularly concerned about production stability.
This is a game changer for teams doing Chaos Engineering! We integrated it with our existing Prometheus + Prometheus and the results were immediate. Developer productivity up 40%, deployment frequency up 3x, and MTTR down 60%. Best investment we made this year.
We tried this but hit issues with X. How did you solve it? Trying to build a business case for management.
Cautionary tale: we rushed this implementation without proper testing and it caused a 4-hour outage. The issue was memory leak in the worker. Lesson learned: always test in staging first, especially when dealing with authentication services.
We implemented this using the following approach:
1. First step...
2. Then we...
3. Finally...
Results: significant improvement in deployment speed. Setup: AWS, GKE, 82 services.
Did you consider alternatives? Why did you choose this one? We're evaluating this for Q1 implementation.
Thanks for sharing! We're planning to try this next quarter.
Be careful with this approach. We had production issues.
In our production environment with 200+ microservices, we found that Docker significantly outperformed Kubernetes. The key was proper configuration of timeout settings. Deployment time dropped from 45min to 8min. Highly recommended for teams running Kubernetes at scale.
Great point! We've seen similar results in our environment.
We evaluated this last year. The main challenge was...
Has anyone else encountered issues with Grafana when running in GCP us-west-2? We're seeing intermittent failures during peak traffic. Our setup: serverless with New Relic. Starting to wonder if we should switch to ArgoCD.
Exactly! This is what we implemented last month.
This is a game changer for teams doing CI/CD! We integrated it with our existing GitHub Actions + GitHub Actions and the results were immediate. Developer productivity up 40%, deployment frequency up 3x, and MTTR down 60%. Best investment we made this year.
We benchmarked 5 solutions:
1. Option A: fast but expensive
2. Option B: cheap but limited
3. Option C: goldilocks zone ✓
Ended up with C, saved 40% vs A.
Consider the long-term maintenance burden before adopting.
How does this scale? We're running 100+ services. Looking for real-world benchmarks if anyone has them.
Works well in theory, but production reality is different.
- 10 Forums
- 93 Topics
- 1,770 Posts
- 0 Online
- 100 Members