Forum

Search
Close
AI Search
Classic Search
 Search Phrase:
 Search Type:
Advanced search options
 Search in Forums:
 Search in date period:

 Sort Search Results by:

AI Assistant
Deep dive: Implemen...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Deep dive: Implementing zero trust security in Kubernetes

6 Posts
6 Users
0 Reactions
505 Views
(@christina.gutierrez3)
Posts: 0
Topic starter
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 
[#288]

We went a different direction on this using Terraform, AWS CDK, and CloudFormation. The main reason was security must be built in from the start, not bolted on later. However, I can see how your method would be better for fast-moving startups. Have you considered integration with our incident management system?

One more thing worth mentioning: integration with existing tools was smoother than anticipated.

For context, we're using Terraform, AWS CDK, and CloudFormation.

For context, we're using Terraform, AWS CDK, and CloudFormation.

One more thing worth mentioning: we had to iterate several times before finding the right balance.

Feel free to reach out if you have more questions - happy to share our runbooks and documentation.

One thing I wish I knew earlier: documentation debt is as dangerous as technical debt. Would have saved us a lot of time.


 
Posted : 09/01/2025 12:21 pm
(@deborah.howard208)
Posts: 0
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Some tips from our journey: 1) Automate everything possible 2) Monitor proactively 3) Practice incident response 4) Keep it simple. Common mistakes to avoid: over-engineering early. Resources that helped us: Google SRE book. The most important thing is collaboration over tools.

Feel free to reach out if you have more questions - happy to share our runbooks and documentation.

For context, we're using Kubernetes, Helm, ArgoCD, and Prometheus.

I'd recommend checking out relevant blog posts for more details.

I'd recommend checking out the official documentation for more details.

One thing I wish I knew earlier: security must be built in from the start, not bolted on later. Would have saved us a lot of time.

I'd recommend checking out conference talks on YouTube for more details.

For context, we're using Vault, AWS KMS, and SOPS.

Additionally, we found that the human side of change management is often harder than the technical implementation.

Feel free to reach out if you have more questions - happy to share our runbooks and documentation.


 
Posted : 10/01/2025 4:03 pm
 Paul
(@paul)
Posts: 0
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Neat! We solved this another way using Grafana, Loki, and Tempo. The main reason was starting small and iterating is more effective than big-bang transformations. However, I can see how your method would be better for larger teams. Have you considered feature flags for gradual rollouts?

The end result was 40% cost savings on infrastructure.

Feel free to reach out if you have more questions - happy to share our runbooks and documentation.

One thing I wish I knew earlier: the human side of change management is often harder than the technical implementation. Would have saved us a lot of time.


 
Posted : 12/01/2025 12:54 pm
(@linda.foster79)
Posts: 0
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

We had a comparable situation on our project. The problem: deployment failures. Our initial approach was manual intervention but that didn't work because lacked visibility. What actually worked: compliance scanning in the CI pipeline. The key insight was cross-team collaboration is essential for success. Now we're able to scale automatically.

I'd recommend checking out the community forums for more details.

The end result was 50% reduction in deployment time.

One thing I wish I knew earlier: failure modes should be designed for, not discovered in production. Would have saved us a lot of time.


 
Posted : 13/01/2025 8:55 am
(@william.smith189)
Posts: 0
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Excellent thread! One consideration often overlooked is team dynamics. We learned this the hard way when team morale improved significantly once the manual toil was automated away. Now we always make sure to include in design reviews. It's added maybe a few hours to our process but prevents a lot of headaches down the line.

Additionally, we found that automation should augment human decision-making, not replace it entirely.

The end result was 50% reduction in deployment time.

The end result was 99.9% availability, up from 99.5%.


 
Posted : 13/01/2025 2:01 pm
(@nicholas.morgan692)
Posts: 0
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

This is exactly our story too. We learned: Phase 1 (6 weeks) involved stakeholder alignment. Phase 2 (2 months) focused on pilot implementation. Phase 3 (1 month) was all about full rollout. Total investment was $100K but the payback period was only 6 months. Key success factors: automation, documentation, feedback loops. If I could do it again, I would invest more in training.

One more thing worth mentioning: we had to iterate several times before finding the right balance.


 
Posted : 13/01/2025 10:23 pm
Share:
Scroll to Top